As reported in [1], completions provided by "set global completers
option=my_completion" activate insert mode autocompletion, even when
the autocomplete option does not have the insert mode flag.
This happens because InsertCompleter::on_option_changed() calls
InsertCompleter::setup_ifn(), which shows the completion pager.
Fix this by computing whether the completion pager is enabled;
otherwise we can return early from setup_ifn().
The completion pager is enabled if the autocompletion bit is set,
or if the user has requested explicit completion.
[1]: https://github.com/kak-lsp/kak-lsp/issues/585
When `set` or `se` is found at the start of the modeline, it should stop parsing options after `:`.
When `modeline-parse` is called in the following file, it should _not_ recognize `tabstop=4` and `invalid_option=3`.
```
# kak: set indentwidth=0 tabstop=16: tabstop=4 invalid_option=3
```
More info: http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/options.html#modeline
Now that it is, we get the following error when trying to execute
`test/compose/select-display-columns`
```sh
./enabled: 2: [: 4: unexpected operator
```
This commit fixes the enabled check
Even though the synopsis mentioned `kak -f` accepts filenames, it wasn't clear
to me that Kakoune would filter them in-place by default (I guess I assumed it
would write them to stdout like sed(1)).
In normal mode, the mode line contains "1 sel" or "n sels (k)" when n > 1,
whereas in insert mode, it contains "n sels (k)" even for n == 1. Change
the contents in insert mode to match normal mode.
I dedicate any and all copyright interest in this software to the
public domain. I make this dedication for the benefit of the public at
large and to the detriment of my heirs and successors. I intend this
dedication to be an overt act of relinquishment in perpetuity of all
present and future rights to this software under copyright law.
trim_indent call was incorrect, trim_indent is intended to work
on multi-line strings and trims trailing whitespace as well (could
benefit from a better name).
Fixes#4378
adds the ability to press <ret> within a hunk and navigate to the original
source code. This can be useful because one often needs to go back and forth
between the diff and the full source code.
- You can press <ret> anywhere _within_ a hunk i.e. lines that start with
` `, `+`, `-`. You will be taken to the exact line in the source that corresponds
to where you pressed <ret> in the hunk. It actually does not make sense
to press <ret> on a `-` line because that does not exist anymore but
in that case you are taken to a nearby line in the hope this is still useful.
- You can also press <ret> on a range line (lines that
look like @@ ... @@). If you press <ret> on anywhere on a range line e.g.
```
@@ -120,3 +123,4 @@ fn some_function {
```
The code will try to navigate to the section heading "fn some_function {"
Note that the section heading is _not_ necessarily located at the
range line (in the above example the range line is 123).
- You can press <ret> on a +++ line also and you will be taken the first
line of the file
Caveats:
- Navigation to the original source file will be accurate only if any edits to
the original source file have been saved to disk, because otherwise
they will not be detected by the `:git diff` or `:git show` commands
- This feature should work well for most typical uses e.g. `:git diff`, `:git diff HEAD^`
`:git diff <some-sha1>`. In fact this feature should work in all scenarios when
the *current files* on disk are being compared _with_ some arbitrary git revision/staging.
It will be less useful in other scenarios when two arbitrary revisions are being
compared to each other or when you are trying to compare staging to some revision.
For example when you invoke `:git diff --staged` you are trying to compare staging
with HEAD but are navigating to what is currently on disk (which may be different
from staging).
Co-authored-by: Johannes Altmanninger <aclopte@gmail.com>
Merge all lookarounds into the same instruction, merge splits, merge
literal ignore case with literal...
Besides reducing the amount of almost duplicated code, this improves
performance by reducing pressure on the (often failing) branch target
prediction for instruction dispatching by moving branches into the
instruction code themselves where they are more likely to be well
predicted.
